Groom at a wedding

Drunk Groom Picks The Wrong Fiancée And Ends Up Arrested

Drunk Groom Picks The Wrong Fiancée And Ends Up Arrested

He kissed his best friend! From wedding to battle: the unusual mistake of a drunken groom that unleashed chaos and ended in arrest.

What was supposed to be an afternoon of happiness ended in a scandal worthy of a Hollywood movie . A wedding in northern India turned into a family confrontation after the groom, who was obviously intoxicated, made an unusual mistake during the ceremony.

The traditional Hindu wedding was going on as normal until the crucial moment arrived: the exchange of ceremonial garlands, a symbol of union between the bride and groom.

However, a confused and drunk Ravindra Kumar, 26, placed the garland around the necks of three people before reaching his bride-to-be.

The breaking point came when, in his drunken state, Kumar garlanded the bride’s best friend instead of his 21-year-old fiancée, Radha Devi.

The young woman, shocked and embarrassed, reacted immediately: she slapped her boyfriend hard and cancelled the wedding on the spot, leaving the place.

A massive brawl and an unexpected arrest

Following the bride’s decision , tensions quickly escalated between the families of both parties, who began to argue heatedly.

What began as an exchange of words turned into a collective brawl, with pushing and shouting that alerted the authorities.

Groom at a wedding
The protagonist of the wedding in India.

Police moved in to control the situation and arrested Ravindra Kumar, accusing him of disturbing public order and violating India’s strict anti-dowry law, which prohibits the bride’s family from giving property or money to the groom as part of the marriage .

A multimillion-dollar lawsuit after the humiliation

Far from ending the scandal, the bride’s family filed a formal complaint against Kumar. They accuse him of humiliating the bride and lying about his profession to arrange the wedding.

They are also seeking financial compensation of 450,000 rupees (about $4,800) for damages to the family’s reputation and the costs of the wedding, which never took place.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *